Note: this post contains spoilers for both movie and the book.
I've seen Sideways a couple of times, about a year ago. Recently, though, my wife bought me a copy on DVD, and I watched it again this weekend. After seeing the movie, I got a bug up my butt to read the book. As a result, after a couple of quick calls, I found a copy at a used book store nearby. This too, I read this weekend. Both are fresh in my mind, therefore I thought that I'd give a critique, comparing the both of them.
For those who have not seen the movie or read the book, basically, the story unfolds as a tale about about two middle aged men. One character, Miles, is portrayed as a depressed, divorced, aspiring writer, who is also a wine buff. The other character, Jack, is a washed up actor, who is getting married in a week. They travel from LA to nearby Santa Ynez wine country, to spend a week drinking wine and playing golf, as a sort of send off for Jack, before he stumbles into married life. Needless to say, it does not quite go as planned as Jack decides he is going to have one last fling with a girl he meets behind the counter of a wine tasting room. Miles also falls for a long time acquaintance from previous trips that works at his favorite wine country restaurant, the Hitching Post. The whole thing is wrapped up in a sort of bitter-sweet comedy of sorts, building on one absurd situation after another, up to a climax of Jack's marriage that almost does not happen.
Though the story is fiction, the places in the book are very real. In fact, Julie and I visited many of the places featured, last year, including the wineries, Sanford, Foxen, and Fess Parker (aka Frass Canyon, in the movie), and also the restaurant, the Hitching Post.
Comparing the movie and book, first, the movie unfolds like a Cliff Notes version of the book. Though most of the scenes in the movie also appear in the book, they do not appear necessarily in the same order, and are abbreviated compared to the book. These scenes include going to Miles mom's house to get money, traveling to different wineries, the double date with the girls that become their love interests, drunk dialing Miles' ex-wife, a night of wine at one of the girl's house, golfing, getting Jack's wallet back after it is stolen, crashing the car they drive, the wedding, and so on.
There are some things, though, that give the book a slightly different feel. First and foremost, the book unfolds as a first person narrative from Miles' point of view, which gives the book a more personal feel than the movie. The reader really gets to know Miles: his anxiety and depression, his personal feelings women, and so on. Especially, though, you get his take on wine, and his love of Pinot Noir. In fact, the book reads like wine tasting notes with a story interspersed in-between.
In addition, like many books with a movie adaptation, the book version simply has story elements and details that are left out of the movie version for brevity.
One example that is in the book, but not in the movie: there is an important chapter about boar hunting that sets up some details for later. During that scene, Miles tries to avoid the absurd situation of his best friend cheating on his soon-to-be wife by convincing him to go boar hunting with another character we meet earlier in the book. That scene turns crazy as they are the ones getting hunted, not the boar. Jack gets the first of his injuries in that scene. In fact, unlike the movie, Jack's injuries occur throughout the second half of the book, not as a single instance brought on by a scorned woman, like the movie portrays.
There are also details that are changed for seemingly no apparent reason. For instance, the character in the movie, Stephanie, who Jack hooks up with for some hot sex, is named Terra in the book. Even the details of that character is changed. In the movie, she is a hot Asian chick, who rides a motorcycle. In the book, she is a blond New Yorker that drives a Jeep. And speaking of cars, in the movie, the two men drive an old Saab through wine country. In the book, it is a 4Runner. However, in both cases, the vehicles get wreaked at the end.
Because movies are often abbreviated versions of books, like mentioned above, there are common sentiments that movies, in general, are never quite as good as the book versions. However, that is not necessarily true, in my opinion. In fact, there are important scenes in the movie that simply do not appear in the book. Two scenes come to mind.
First, there is a powerful scene at Stephanie's house when Miles is asked by Maya, his love interest, about Pinot Noir, the wine varietal he is so obsessed with. When asked why he likes it so much, he says the following, as quoted from IMDB in the memorable quotes section for the movie:
Uh, I don't know, I don't know. Um, it's a hard grape to grow, as you know. Right? It's uh, it's thin-skinned, temperamental, ripens early. It's, you know, it's not a survivor like Cabernet, which can just grow anywhere and uh, thrive even when it's neglected. No, Pinot needs constant care and attention. You know? And in fact it can only grow in these really specific, little, tucked away corners of the world. And, and only the most patient and nurturing of growers can do it, really. Only somebody who really takes the time to understand Pinot's potential can then coax it into its fullest expression. Then, I mean, oh its flavors, they're just the most haunting and brilliant and thrilling and subtle and ancient on the planet.
What makes the scene so powerful is that we, as the audience, realize that he is describing himself to Maya, the girl he is falling for, not just the wine he loves so much.
Another scene comes to mind: Throughout the movie, Miles talks about his prized bottle of wine, a 1961 Cheval Blanc. The movie climaxes after he has been dissed by the woman he loves and humiliated by his ex-wife; he drinks the wine in a fast food restaurant out of a plastic cup, gulping it down like soda. That powerful idea simply does not appear in the book.
Which is better: movie or book? I do not know. They are two different art mediums that both effectively tell a similar story. I like them both for different reasons. I recommend experiencing both. As a result, I've added both to my sidebar as recommendations.